South Korea President Ousted: Yoon Suk Yeol’s impeachment by Parliament has been upheld by the Constitutional Court of South Korea, which has formally removed him from office. Yoon’s contentious imposition of martial law on December 3, which lasted for just six hours before being revoked, set off months of political unrest. The court unanimously decided that Yoon’s acts were unconstitutional and seriously undermined the stability of the country.
When he declared martial law, Yoon(South Korea President) ordered police and military troops to block the National Assembly, which he claimed was abusing its parliamentary majority. The court determined that these acts went beyond the president’s authority and were unconstitutional. The opposition-controlled legislature began the process of impeaching Yoon, suspending his presidential duties and referring the matter to the Constitutional Court.
South Korea must choose a new leader in a presidential election within 60 days of Yoon’s dismissal. Until the election is over, Prime Minister Han Duck-soo will operate as South Korea President. With frequent demonstrations in favor of and against Yoon’s impeachment, the political crisis has widened rifts among the nation.
To make matters more complicated politically, Yoon is now facing a separate criminal trial for alleged rebellion. Yoon becomes the first current South Korean president to be impeached upon the court’s ruling, making it a historic milestone. As the nation deals with the fallout from Yoon’s contentious administration and gets ready for a new leader, this decision has a big impact on South Korea’s democracy and stability.
Also Read – Trump’s Tariffs Shake Global Economy: Markets Extend Losses
despair and Jubilation as South Korea president removed from office
After South Korea President Yoon Suk Yeol was ousted from office, South Korea is experiencing a mixture of joy and sadness. Citing his contentious imposition of martial law as a constitutional infringement, the Constitutional Court maintained his impeachment. The nation is split over this landmark decision, with both Yoon’s admirers and detractors turning to the streets in significant numbers.
Many saw the court’s ruling as a win for constitutional order and democracy. Joyful crowds gathered in the vicinity of the National Assembly, commemorating what they perceive to be a victory for justice. People celebrated the triumph of the rule of law over authoritarian impulses by dancing, hugging, and crying. Conversely, South Korea President Yoon’s followers are struggling with hopelessness and rage. They contend that in order to resolve political impasse and preserve order, he had to take certain acts. Concerns about a protracted national split have been raised by the escalation of his loyalists’ protests.
South Korea is at a turning point as it gets ready for a new presidential election in 60 days. Although Yoon’s dismissal represents a turning point in its democratic history, there are several obstacles in the way. In order to maintain stability and unity following this political upheaval, the nation must properly manage this time.
The South Korean president is elected to a single, five-year term and cannot be re-elected. This restriction was put in place to avoid long-term control and guarantee a regular change of leadership.
South Korea Martial Law Controversy
The South Korean Martial Law Controversy refers to the political crisis triggered by South Korea President Yoon Suk Yeol’s declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024.
- Martial Law Declaration: Yoon mobilized military forces to obstruct the National Assembly, preventing lawmakers from convening.
- Immediate Reversal: Within hours, legislators defied the military blockade and voted unanimously to lift martial law.
- Impeachment & Removal: The opposition-controlled parliament impeached Yoon, and on April 4, 2025, the Constitutional Court upheld his removal, citing his actions as unconstitutional.
- Public Reaction: The decision sparked celebrations and protests, with Yoon’s supporters arguing that his actions were necessary to maintain order.
- This controversy has deeply divided South Korea, raising concerns about democratic stability and the future of its leadership.